Brian E Adams3y100I think the best way to stop a bad guy with an AI is a good guy with an AI. And hamstringing the well intentioned people willing to play by the rules will only give the edge to the bad guys. Your designs could backfire spectacularly, were it even workable. Reply
tcelferact3y100The idea here is to prepare for an emergency stop if we are lucky enough to notice things going spectacularly wrong before it's too late. I don't think there's any hamstringing of well-intentioned people implied by that!Reply
91Selective truth-telling: concerns about EA leadership communication.tcelferact·3y ago·6m readtcelferact·3y ago·6m read4545
30Career Advice: Philosophy + Programming -> AI Safetytcelferact·4y ago·2m readtcelferact·4y ago·2m read1111
568 EA and the current funding situationWilliam_MacAskill·4y ago·28m readWilliam_MacAskill·4y ago·28m read185185
395Concrete Biosecurity Projects (some of which could be big)ASB, eca·4y ago·6m readASB, eca+ 1 more·4y ago·6m read7272
275Announcing a contest: EA Criticism and Red TeamingLizka, finm, jtm·4y ago·16m readLizka, finm, jtm+ 2 more·4y ago·16m read6666
I think the best way to stop a bad guy with an AI is a good guy with an AI.
And hamstringing the well intentioned people willing to play by the rules will only give the edge to the bad guys.
Your designs could backfire spectacularly, were it even workable.
The idea here is to prepare for an emergency stop if we are lucky enough to notice things going spectacularly wrong before it's too late. I don't think there's any hamstringing of well-intentioned people implied by that!