JP Addison
Interim head of the CEA Online Team, which runs this Forum.
A bit about me, to help you get to know me: Prior to CEA, I was a data engineer at an aerospace startup. I got into EA through reading the entire archive of Slate Star Codex in 2015. I found EA naturally compelling, and donated to AMF, then GFI, before settling on my current cause prioritization of meta-EA, with AI x-risk as my object-level preference. I try to have a wholehearted approach to morality, rather than thinking of it as an obligation or opportunity. You see my LessWrong profile here.
I love this Forum a bunch. I've been working on it for 5 years as of this writing, and founded the EA Forum 2.0. (Remember 1.0?) I have an intellectual belief in it as an impactful project, but also a deep love for it as an open platform where anyone can come participate in the project of effective altruism. We're open 24/7, anywhere there is an internet connection.
In my personal life, I hang out in the Boston EA and Gaymer communities, enjoy houseplants, table tennis, and playing coop games with my partner, who has more karma than me.
I believe we fixed this here.
Sorry about that, we recently broke this fixing another bug. Fix should be live momentarily.
LessWrong is thinking about this. I don't want to make it user toggle-able. My guess is that removing the voting from the top of the post that's more the direction I'm going. LW wants to try it for admins to see how they find it before shipping it further.
Thanks for the suggestion, I've belated added to our backlog.
Should be fixed on our next deploy: https://github.com/ForumMagnum/ForumMagnum/pull/7618
Replying there.
Indeed our new reacts system separates them. But our new reacts system also doesn't have strong votes. A problem with displaying the number of types of votes when strong votes are involved is that it much more easily allows for deanonymization if there are only a few people in the thread.
This is really cool, I'm curating. It seems super clear and crisp to me, which doesn't seem like it'd be easy to do.
Update, we have unbanned Vee. We are new to using AI detection tools and we made a mistake. We apologize.
I'm a big fan of increasing efficiency. But I guess I would guess that proving optimality under certain conditions is not the best way to go about designing a system to be efficient? It's probably part of the process for sure. (Epistemic status, very unsure here.)